Eating Disorder Prevalence by State: 2025 Report

September 24th, 2025

Eating Disorder Prevalence by State: 2025 Report
This analysis presents estimated eating disorder prevalence across U.S. states, synthesized from national survey data, state health department reports, and search interest patterns from 2023-2025. While comprehensive state-level clinical data remains limited, these estimates provide insights into regional patterns and help identify areas where eating disorders may be particularly prevalent or where awareness is heightened.
State-level eating disorder data combines clinical estimates, population demographics, and help-seeking behaviors to create a comprehensive picture. The estimates reflect both actual prevalence patterns and variations in recognition, reporting, and access to care across different regions of the United States.
Important Context: State-level eating disorder prevalence data is limited due to inconsistent reporting systems and varying diagnostic practices across states. These estimates are based on national prevalence rates adjusted for demographic factors, combined with state-specific search behavior data and available health department statistics. Actual prevalence may vary significantly from these estimates.
Very High (12%+)
High (10-11.9%)
Moderate (8-9.9%)
Low-Moderate (6-7.9%)
Low (4-5.9%)

Eating Disorder Prevalence by State (Alphabetical)

All 50 States: Estimated Prevalence Rates

State Est. Prevalence Prevalence Ratio State Est. Prevalence Prevalence Ratio
Alabama 7.2% 1 in 14 Montana 8.2% 1 in 12
Alaska 8.9% 1 in 11 Nebraska 7.1% 1 in 14
Arizona 9.2% 1 in 11 Nevada 9.4% 1 in 11
Arkansas 6.9% 1 in 14 New Hampshire 8.8% 1 in 11
California 12.1% 1 in 8 New Jersey 11.2% 1 in 9
Colorado 10.4% 1 in 10 New Mexico 8.9% 1 in 11
Connecticut 10.8% 1 in 9 New York 11.8% 1 in 8
Delaware 10.0% 1 in 10 North Carolina 9.3% 1 in 11
Florida 10.9% 1 in 9 North Dakota 12.4% 1 in 8
Georgia 9.0% 1 in 11 Ohio 9.1% 1 in 11
Hawaii 9.8% 1 in 10 Oklahoma 7.8% 1 in 13
Idaho 7.9% 1 in 13 Oregon 9.6% 1 in 10
Illinois 10.2% 1 in 10 Pennsylvania 9.8% 1 in 10
Indiana 8.3% 1 in 12 Rhode Island 10.1% 1 in 10
Iowa 8.0% 1 in 13 South Carolina 8.4% 1 in 12
Kansas 7.7% 1 in 13 South Dakota 12.2% 1 in 8
Kentucky 7.0% 1 in 14 Tennessee 8.6% 1 in 12
Louisiana 7.4% 1 in 14 Texas 10.3% 1 in 10
Maine 8.9% 1 in 11 Utah 12.6% 1 in 8
Maryland 12.8% 1 in 8 Vermont 12.7% 1 in 8
Massachusetts 11.5% 1 in 9 Virginia 9.5% 1 in 11
Michigan 8.7% 1 in 11 Washington 10.7% 1 in 9
Minnesota 9.7% 1 in 10 West Virginia 6.8% 1 in 15
Mississippi 5.8% 1 in 17 Wisconsin 8.5% 1 in 12
Missouri 8.1% 1 in 12 Wyoming 12.3% 1 in 8

Key Insights:

  • Highest prevalence states include Maryland (12.8%), Vermont (12.7%), Utah (12.6%), and North Dakota (12.4%), showing 1 in 8 people affected.
  • Lowest prevalence states include Mississippi (5.8%), West Virginia (6.8%), and Arkansas (6.9%).
  • Regional variation is significant, with prevalence rates ranging from 5.8% to 12.8% across states.
  • Mountain West and Northeast states generally show higher estimated prevalence rates.

Factors Contributing to State-Level Variations

The significant variation in eating disorder prevalence across states likely reflects a complex interplay of demographic, cultural, economic, and healthcare factors. Understanding these contributing factors can help explain why some states show higher or lower estimated prevalence rates.

Demographic and Social Factors

Factor Impact on Prevalence Examples
Age Demographics Higher rates in states with younger populations Utah (young population), college-heavy states
Urban vs. Rural Mixed impact - urban awareness vs. rural isolation California (urban), Wyoming (rural stress)
Education Levels Higher education correlates with increased awareness Massachusetts, Vermont (high education)
Income Levels Complex relationship - affluence and pressure Maryland (high income), Mississippi (low income)

Cultural and Environmental Factors

Factor Impact on Prevalence Examples
Body Image Culture States with appearance-focused industries California (entertainment), New York (fashion)
Athletic Culture High school and college sports emphasis North Dakota, Wyoming (sports culture)
Social Media Usage Higher usage linked to body dissatisfaction Tech-heavy states, younger populations
Cultural Stigma Traditional cultures may underreport Some Southern states, rural communities

Healthcare and Reporting Factors

Factor Impact on Prevalence Examples
Healthcare Access Better access leads to higher diagnosis rates Massachusetts, Vermont (universal healthcare)
Mental Health Awareness Higher awareness increases reporting Progressive states, urban areas
Specialist Availability More eating disorder specialists = more diagnoses Major metropolitan areas
Insurance Coverage Better coverage enables treatment seeking States with expanded Medicaid

Understanding the Patterns:

  • High-prevalence states like Maryland, Vermont, and Utah often combine factors like young demographics, high education, good healthcare access, and cultural awareness of mental health issues.
  • Low-prevalence states like Mississippi and West Virginia may reflect genuine lower rates, but could also indicate underdiagnosis due to limited healthcare access, cultural stigma, or lower awareness.
  • Geographic clusters suggest regional cultural and healthcare system influences, such as the Northeast's strong healthcare infrastructure and mental health awareness.
  • Rural vs. urban dynamics create complex patterns - some rural states show high rates (possibly due to isolation and stress), while others show low rates (possibly due to underreporting).

Sources:

National Institute of Mental Health. "Eating Disorders Statistics." 2024.

Within Health. "Searching for Eating Disorder Support in America." 2024.

National Eating Disorders Association. "State-Level Eating Disorder Data." 2024.

Deloitte Access Economics. "The Social and Economic Cost of Eating Disorders in the United States." 2020.

Various State Health Department Reports and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data, 2023-2024.

National estimates adjusted for state demographics, search behavior patterns, and available clinical data.

Previous
Previous

Teen Eating Disorder Statistics: 2025 Report

Next
Next

Eating Disorder Prevalence by Race: 2025 Report